|
Grape Sampling and Fruit Maturity Evaluation
MSU HRT 434 L: Laboratory 2 Grape Sampling and Fruit Maturity Evaluation
- W.C. Paetz September 4, 2003
Abstract:
One of the most important decisions regarding wine grapes
is knowing, when to harvest? The grower may desire to pick as
early as possible. This may preclude rot, rain cracking, bird harvest
or frost which may decimate the crop. The wine maker on the other hand
desires fully ripe well- balanced fruit. This may fulfill the enologist’s
desire for a great wine.
As berries mature the color develops, sugar levels increase,
acids are respired and pH rises. Desirable characteristics of
the grape cultivar are developed. To determine the optimally perfect harvest
time is as much an art as it is a science. Experience over a wide variation
of seasons can help predict when is most propitious. The improvement of
wine quality that results from properly matured fruit is well documented
even legendary.
Our goal of a selection of a representative sampling was assured
by a protocol of culling berries from every part of the canopy
of the grape-vines we were assigned. We selected from interior and exterior
of the vine canopy. We selected basal as well as apical berries. We picked
grapes from the interior and exterior of the vine. After a selection of
fifty berries we carried our sample to the lab and conducted tests which
disclosed the following results: Brix = 15.3, pH = 2.99 and TA of 16.475
g/L. My initial assessment is that this is too early to harvest.
Introduction:
In a climate that is relatively consistent from year to year the
characteristics of the various cultivars develop with predictable regularity.
The sugar / acid ratio may be enough to predict when to harvest. While
the acid level and aroma are temperature moderated the sugar is dependent
upon photosynthesis. The measurement of total acid, titratable acid and
pH of the fruit is a better index of maturity. Although the French may
disagree, scientific approaches give repeatable accurate results and they
take some of the guesswork out of enology.
Equipment and experiments conducted:
We used a hand held refractometer to determine Brix or sugar level.
After squeezing fifty berries, selected to assure a random representative
sample a large drop of juice was placed upon the refractometer glass.
After closing the lid the sugar level or Brix was read directly from the
scale on the instrument. No adjustments were made for temperature. My
reading was 15.3 or 15.3% sugar. (Brix also correlates to soluble solids
within the must or grape juice)
Our second measurement was done with a pH-meter. First we calibrated
the meter using a buffer solution to assure the correct reading on the
scale. We then washed the electrodes with distilled water and assumed
that the temperature of the wine must and pH sample was the same. We poured
a small 50-ml sample into a beaker and inserted the electrode. The blue
pippin was removed from the probe and kept open during our testing. After
a brief moment we were able to record the pH level from the meter. My
pH reading was 2.99. This is the potenz Hydrogen or percentage of Hydrogen.
This hydrogen ion concentration is an inverse measure of acid. A measure
of 7 would be neutral, 14 would be extremely basic in this case 2.99 high
acid is indicated.
Our third measurement was to determine the total acidity.
100 mills of water were added to 10mills of juice. Water was at 8.2 =
our zero point prior to adding the sample. It required 23.3 mills of NaOH
sodium hydroxide to neutralize the solution back to the set point of 8.2.
The probe was washed and dried then inserted into the solution. A magnetic
stir bar was used to make a solution of the must and water. Slowly sodium
hydroxide was added until 8.2 read on the scale. The amount of NaOH required
was 23.3 mills this factor multiplied by .75 resulted in a reading of
16.475 g/L of total acid. This is a very high reading for making a dry
red wine. Perhaps it may be closer to the desired characteristics of a
sparkling wine must.
Results:
Too often a green-grape herbaceous taste is present in wines and
can not be over come by the enologist. This component may well
be attributed to the early harvest of under-ripe fruit. I believe in Michigan
sugar levels of over 21% and acid of not over 1% are desirable for optimum
wine quality. In general Michigan grapes should be harvested as late as
possible (before a killing frost) to foster higher sugar content and a
corresponding decrease in acidity. Although the experienced enologist
may be able to judge grapes for potential harvest by tasting in the vineyard,
even assuming the most developed organoliptic skills pale in comparison
to a scientific analysis.
Conclusions:
The most significant criteria of wine grape maturity are sugar,
acidity, pH, and Brix-acid ratio of fresh pressed juice. The
criterion most commonly employed is sugar content. To a limited extent
pH has been used as the sole basis for determination that wine grapes
should be harvested. It is true that pH is important to taste and color
especially in table grapes, but with wine grapes the need for full development
of the berry and higher sugar content is essential.
The must of our Marechal Foch indicates that it is not yet ready
to be harvested. In spite of the fact that this is an early cultivar,
the grapes we sampled should be left to hang until the phenols; sugars,
acids and anthocyanins are more desirable. I would guess within the next
two weeks a great harvest could be depended upon especially because of
the hot sunny days we have recently experienced.
Back to MSU Page
|